1^ Beyond opaque, Koons’ works are actually reflective. Perhaps it’s why billionaires like them: it lets them see their face in it. It’s almost too perfect: a grand-satire would certainly explain the initials at the base of every work…
2^ The physicalist position on perception is that it is
just a brain process. If the brain process of seeing red is different from that of learning everything about it (as would seem intuitive), this is not an antiphysicalist scenario. In fact, it’s own creator
retracted it in 1998 despite it’s ongoing prevelance in contemporary philosphy. A brilliant analysis of what physicalist thinkers
really don’t account for can be found in Thomas Nagel’s
What Is It Like to Be a Bat?
3^ With the idea of “lashes being so heavy they end up down-casting his eyelids”, I’m trying to play off of two ideas of lashes. One as a physically manifestated metaphor for the ugly issues with his outlook and the other as in the
lashes he received from his abusive father as a child, which he
sighted as an influence on his pessimistic worldview.